10 for '10: The Year in Movies
From left: Andrew Garfield, Joseph Mazzello and Jesse Eisenberg star in David Fincher's The Social Network.
With 2010 about to fade into our rearview, it's time to pay our respects to a year that produced its share of very good movies, but precious few great ones. It was a year dominated by memorable performances in supporting roles – Christian Bale as a crack-addicted burnout in The Fighter, John Hawkes as a rough-and-tumble hillbilly in Winter's Bone, Jacki Weaver as an insidious matriarch in the overlooked Australian import Animal Kingdom – and the visual bravura of Inception, Scott Pilgrim vs. the World and TRON: Legacy.
It was also a year highlighted by the emergence of Jesse Eisenberg, whose turn as cold-blooded Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg powered The Social Network, and the continued reign of Leonardo DiCaprio, the emotional anchor of two movies, Inception and Martin Scorsese's Shutter Island, that tested the elasticity of our imaginations. And, finally, it was the year of the documentary, spearheaded by filmmakers like Alex Gibney (Client 9: The Rise and Fall of Eliot Spitzer), Berkeley High graduate Amir Bar-Lev (The Tillman Story) and San Francisco native Charles Ferguson (Inside Job), whose incisive wit informed some of the screen's most fascinating and infuriating true-life stories.
1. The Social Network
Until recently, Mark Zuckerberg, the man most responsible for the world’s largest online clubhouse, managed to remain largely anonymous outside his circle of business associates, who should never be confused with his buddies. David Fincher’s The Social Network changed all that. Never recruited to join any of Harvard’s famously discriminating final clubs, the Facebook co-founder is determined to create his own club, where he not only belongs, but wields absolute power. Did Zuckerberg draw his tireless motivation to succeed from repeated rejections? Was he a misfit looking to fit? What The Social Network makes clear is that Zuckerberg’s former partners, like the girls who couldn't wait to get away, came to see him as a condescending,
status-obsessed geek who holds a grudge. And in some ways Fincher, who has portrayed serial killers both fictional (Seven) and real (Zodiac), has never presented a character as soulless as the implacable cyberpunk. Whether the portrait is accurate is hard to know, but Fincher and Sorkin have forcefully stated their case.
2. Winter's Bone
Winner of the Grand Jury Prize at this year's Sundance Film Festival, Debra Granik's subtle, suspenseful thriller finds Jennifer Lawrence (The Burning Plain) braving the frigid Ozarks and their criminal underworld as she searches for her father, a methamphetamine cooker gone missing after his latest arrest. If the premise sounds familiar – a gritty slice of rural Americana embedded in the fabric of a grim coming-of-age fable – Granik's understated execution and Lawrence's fierce, unaffected performance effortlessly transcend caricature and cliché. So too does John Hawkes (Me and You and Everyone We Know), as her father's ruthless brother, in a chilling supporting turn sure to earn him overdue Oscar consideration.
3. Rabbit Hole
John Cameron Mitchell (Hedwig and the Angry Inch) directs Nicole Kidman and Aaron Eckhart, playing a couple coping with the recent loss of their four-year-old son, in this thoughtful, cautiously upbeat adaptation of David Lindsay-Abaire’s Pulitzer Prize-winning play. Rather than wallowing in their misery, which threatens to drag them down but not the movie, Rabbit Hole focuses on the healing processes that divide parents so consumed by individual grief that neither is attuned to the other’s needs. It's not easy to watch, this moving portrait of lives ruined by an unkind twist of fate, but even at its most agonizing, the movie sounds no false notes.
4. Inception
The premise of Christopher Nolan's thriller sounds deceptively simple: If it were possible to infiltrate the subconscious through people’s dreams, where their most intimate secrets could be stolen, wouldn't it be possible to plant new ideas there as well? Dominic Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) thinks so, but even the world's savviest dream thief is unprepared for the confounding adventure that springs from his daring scheme. Nolan (The Dark Knight) has called Inception his version of a heist film, which speaks only in the most basic terms to the elegantly layered mystery on the screen. With all its breakneck twists and nerve-rattling turns, the director's latest is as much a rapidly unraveling riddle as a raw human drama. It confirms him as a filmmaker of the highest order – a fearless dreamer, undaunted by the limits of possibility, whose future is far brighter than Bruce Wayne’s shadowy Gotham netherworld.
5. The Tillman Story
In a year dominated by chronicles of wayward politicians, crooked financiers, the root causes of America's financial collapse and the tattered legacy of the Bush administration, The Tillman Story targeted its outrage at the outrageous exploitation of a single soldier: Pat Tillman, the former NFL star gunned down by fellow U.S. combatants in Afghanistan, in a hail of "friendly fire." What followed – a cover-up, orchestrated by the army, to turn a senseless death into pro-military propaganda – galvanized Tillman's family in their search for the truth, and put them squarely at odds with a government cynically determined to use the onetime linebacker to promote an unpopular war.

6. Solitary Man
Ben Kalmen, played by Michael Douglas as a cross between Gordon Gekko and the more affable professor he played in 2000's Wonder Boys, is not the guy you’d want dating your daughter, your mom or even a casual friend. At the beginning of Solitary Man, the disgraced car dealer is warned that his heart might be failing him; six-and-a-half years later, he is mired in a quest to recover his youth by sleeping with any woman willing to share his bed. Yet Man is not the belated coming-of-age story you might expect – that would suggest Kalmen learns something along the way. One of the movie’s great strengths, in its convincing portrayal of a man unable or unwilling to put the brakes on his decline, is that Kalmen’s redemption is left as unfinished business. He is a lout, but Douglas, in a masterfully nuanced performance , pulls off a neat trick: He makes Kalmen likable, with a late-emerging grace the character probably doesn’t deserve.
7. 127 Hours
In 2003, a boulder pinned mountain climber Aron Ralston to the wall of Utah's Blue John Canyon for nearly five days, forcing the Indiana native, then 27, to amputate his right arm in a desperate bid to survive. In bringing his story to the screen, Danny Boyle (Slumdog Millionaire) deftly navigates the obvious stumbling blocks, transforming a mostly one-man show with a well-publicized conclusion into arresting, often transcendent drama that speaks not only to Ralston's will but also to the durability of the human spirit. James Franco, in a performance sure to be honored come awards season, is indispensable, portraying Ralston as a self-absorbed but sympathetic victim of circumstance.

8. The Art of the Steal
You don’t have to be an art enthusiast to appreciate The Art of the Steal, Don Argott’s remarkable account of, as one observer puts it, a theft committed in broad daylight. The story Argott tells is heartbreaking and infuriating, an impressively detailed illustration of how opportunistic politicians and well-connected profiteers acted in concert to despoil an American treasure – the Barnes Foundation, one of the finest art collections in the world, located in a picturesque Philadelphia suburb – and, in doing so, flouted the wishes of the man who created it. If the subject sounds too arcane to leave viewers outraged, don’t be deceived. Steal is an important film, and not simply because it affirms the cynical adage that you can’t fight city hall. The lesson here is more chilling – that if you have something worth stealing, no contract, however sacrosanct or ostensibly binding, can protect it. Want your legacy to be honored after you’ve gone? Try living forever.

9. Shutter Island
It is a testament to Martin Scorsese’s prolific gifts as a storyteller that he could venture so far out of his comfort zone – or what is perceived as such – and respond with a film as mesmerizing as Shutter Island. Scorsese has descended into the criminal underworld so often, in movies like Mean Streets and Goodfellas, we need to be reminded from time to time that he isn’t condemned to stay there. Here, in his haunting adaptation of Dennis Lehane's 2003 novel, he explores a different underworld – the hellish confines of the Ashecliffe Hospital for the Criminally Insane, which is just as inhospitable as it sounds. The story, about the increasingly frenzied search for an escaped patient, moves briskly, ushering us deeper into a mystery that seems more complex by the minute. When Scorsese yanks the rug out from beneath us, the shock is genuine – it’s not the sort of trickery you expect from a director who tends to play it straight. But give him this: Playing by a new set of rules, he has once again mastered the game.
10. Kick-Ass
Nobody who’s ever dreamed of being a caped crusader should miss Kick-Ass, a soaring adventure, and a winning coming-of-age comedy, that contemplates the conflicted life of a masked misfit every bit as thoroughly as The Dark Knight, without the brooding overtones. It’s dark, but hardly tortured. There have been grumblings that the movie tries too hard, balancing too many plates at once, but taken on its own delightfully twisted terms, it is bold and uncompromising. It knows how its audience speaks and thinks, and delivers a fable for the ages, deliciously uncensored.
Second Opinions
There is no scientific formula available to critics who struggle to summarize 52 weeks of cinema with an easily sortable end-of-the-year list. Movies are sometimes overlooked. Opinions are molded and inevitably reconsidered over time. Even now, I'm troubled by the nagging suspicion that True Grit, Joel and Ethan Coen's beautifully shot, superbly acted reimagining of the John Wayne classic, belongs somewhere among the year's 10 best.
As I mentioned before, 2010 treated us to so many very good movies, and trying to rank them sometimes seems like a pointless proposition. How could you compare the year's funniest, most lighthearted comedies, Hot Tub Time Machine and Easy A, with A Film Unfinished, Yael Hersonski's powerful deconstruction of Hitler's propaganda machine? The simple answer is that you can't. A comedy that keeps us laughing has achieved its goals just as successfully as a drama that moves us to tears, or a horror film that keeps us awake at night. Which you prefer boils down to a matter of personal taste.
That said, those four movies and several others deserve honorable mention for making our trips to the theater worthwhile. Among them: American: The Bill Hicks Story; Animal Kingdom; Brooklyn's Finest; Client 9: The Rise and Fall of Eliot Spitzer; Cyrus; The Disappearance of Alice Creed; Four Lions; The Ghost Writer; How to Train Your Dragon; Joan Rivers: A Piece of Work; The King's Speech; Let Me In; The Oath; the Red Riding trilogy; and The Town.
under Arts + Culture, Aaron Eckhart, Alex Gibney, Charles Ferguson, Christian Bale, Christopher Nolan, Danny Boyle, David Fincher, David Lindsay-Abaire, Debra Granik, Dennis Lehane, Don Argott, Jacki Weaver, James Franco, Jennifer Lawrence, Jesse Eisenberg, John Cameron Mitchell, John Hawkes, Leonardo DiCaprio, Mark Zuckerberg, Martin Scorsese, Michael Douglas, Nicole Kidman, Pat Tillman
More Arts + Culture Postings
Add Comment
Well, Charles, I think you know where I stand on this. I appreciate any constructive criticism or intelligent debate my stories (or, more accurately, the movies I write about) provoke, but I especially appreciate it when people agree with me. Human nature, I suppose.
I felt compelled to weigh in on this discussion regarding "The Art of the Steal". I saw the film when it was released in theaters early last year and was extremely moved and sufficiently outraged by it. I have read a lot of the criticism since the release and it has left me somewhat baffled. The argument posed by Peter Zimmerman here and some of what I have read that's been critical of the film, continues to bang the drum about the film being "one sided" or even worse - propaganda. I have since seen the film several times and while it no doubt takes the position that the move is a bad idea, the "other side" is well represented. Ed Rendell and Mike Fisher are extremely candid about their intentions to bully and bribe Lincoln University out of their control of the foundation. The film goes into great detail about money that was hidden in the PA state budget to move the Barnes, the PEW Foundations role in changing their tax status and so on and so on.
Most documentaries that focus on a controversial subject take on a particular point of view; Inside Job, The Cove, Tillman Story, Client 9, Casino Jack, etc., etc. I don't think Argott was any more biased in his storytelling than the aforementioned films and directors.
My point in restating the movie's argument wasn't to regurgitate its thesis, but to touch on the facets of that argument that hit so close to home, thus giving the film its emotional resonance. The notion that any of us could die and have our lasting wishes perverted or violated once we're gone is outrageous to me. (The Tillman Story illustrated this disturbing trend even more powerfully than Art of the Steal.) If Argott omitted certain facts to support his position, or if the Barnes will was previously compromised by some of the same people now claiming to honor Barnes' wishes by keeping the Foundation out of Philadelphia, that doesn't completely shock me. I admit that I read a few news articles about the past, present and future of the Barnes, and stopped there. If I had an encyclopedic knowledge of every subject I've seen a documentary about, I'd be some sort of Cliff Clavin-esque genius, or perhaps a Jeopardy champion; If I were to fact-check every filmmaker after viewing his or her film, I'd have little time for anything else. Art of the Steal tells a compelling story. I'm not sure it's the whole truth and nothing but, yet the narrative Argott provides, however one-sided, is entertaining and polarizing. (He's a skillful propagandist, I guess.) I think my end-of-the-year blurb said as much. If it seemed as if I was merely rehashing his thesis as fact, I would argue that A) that was not my intention and B) I felt the need to reiterate the movie's plot a bit more with Art of the Steal than the rest of the movies on my list because most people have never heard of it or the Barnes. You can summarize most fictional narratives in a single sentence - "grieving parents mourn the death of their child," or, "washed-up mogul bottoms out during his midlife crisis." (Rabbit Hole and Solitary Man, respectively.) Art of the Steal is a more complicated story that requires a bit more exposition, partly because the film barely registered a blip on the radar since its release, and partly because most Bay Area readers have never heard of a tiny (but significant) art museum in Pennsylvania's Lower Merion Township.
I see your point, and I think you did an excellent job in this article highlighting what made each film great in 2010. You clearly know your stuff when it comes to the other nine on your list, and the clarity and eloquence with which the article is written is commendable. It's exactly this poise that is so frustrating when "Steal" is then evaluated.
The point of the article, it appears to me, is to elucidate what made each of the Top 10 films brilliant, not to summarize the movie's argument. What's the point of recapping in a Top 10 list? It's a systemized approach to year-end ranking, putting forth what is, in your opinion, the Must Sees of the year. No problem with that. But you can't have both-- you can't say you're simply summarizing without claiming to also be taking a position. It'd be different if you discussed the inevitable (and really implicit) complications with Argott's stance on the Barnes issue. And even if you didn't know, or hadn't investigated, the depth and complexity of the will and Derek Gillman's ostensible break from Barnes' intentions, it's a documentary and so I feel it's important to denote that it's one side of the story. A reader of this article would come away from your discussion of "Steal" thinking that City Hall and a cadre of well-connected rich "profiteers" conspired to break Barnes' will in an attempt to cash in on the incredible value of the collection. If you re-read your paragraph, you in no way make mention of any subtlety or nuance-- you simply state the content as fact. It's here that I take issue with your evaluation. Not because you don't know the whole enormity of the story, but because you make a declarative statement seemingly upholding the bias of the film without offering any debate whatsoever.
I don't profess myself to be an expert on the Barnes Foundation or its founder's will. I am simply critiquing what I consider to be an excellent film. Most documentaries are biased one way or the other; I happen to love Bowling for Columbine, Fahrenheit 9/11 and Sicko, but I'm not naive enough to think that Michael Moore is presenting a "fair and balanced" argument. Is there another side to the story? I'm sure there is. I see both pros and cons to Argott's position, as I mentioned in my full-length review. However, to suggest that I am ignorantly parading around a filmmaker's agenda without sufficient knowledge of the facts is basically wrong. I am summarizing the movie's argument, and its effect on the audience; it provokes powerful outrage, as it is intended to. That doesn't mean the movie's argument is gospel, it just means that Argott made his points forcefully and with impressive clarity. He has created a fine piece of art, and deserves to be commended accordingly.
I really enjoyed this list until your assessment of "The Art of the Steal." It's clear you've simply accepted the argument put forward by the extremely biased filmmaker, without really investigating the issue to find the truth behind the lies swirling from both sides.
"The Art of the Steal" is but one opinion on an extremely complicated issue. Have you questioned other parts of Barnes' will, that the Foundation and/or Merion Township have flaunted and broken in the past decades? Or have you really spent time to weigh other sides of the debate?
It's fine to like a documentary because of its razor-sharp commentary, thoughtful execution and persuasive content; however, to simply parade around holding the banner of the filmmaker's agenda without really grasping (or even attempting to, it seems) the enormity of the situation is yet another reason why 7x7's hyperbole is often its major Achilles heel.
I hope the Oscar judges are also impressed by "The Tillman Story". Amir Bar-Lev's film contributed to restoring Pat's legacy by honoring the man, not the myth. The iconoclast, not the icon. As his mother said, “Pat would have wanted to be remembered as an individual, not as a stock figure or political prop. Pat was a real hero, not what they used him as.”
However, Amir Bar-Lev's portrayal of the story ended too soon, with the 8-01-07 Congressional hearing. Last July, I sent him a letter (see “The [Untold] Tillman Story” at http://www.feralfirefighter.blogspot.com) arguing that his film would have more "impact" if it also told the “untold story” of how President Obama and the Democratic Congress continued the Army & Bush administration cover-up of Tillman's friendly-fire death.
Instead, "The Tillman Story" was dismissed by the media as not presenting any "news" about the Tillman story. His film wasn't controversial, it threatened none of the politicians still in office. Gen. McChrystal, who personally led the cover-up, was barely a footnote in the film and is off making $50,000 on the lecture circuit ... meanwhile, the film is no longer showing after peaking at only 28 screens.
Just before the 2006 mid-term elections, Kevin Tillman published his eloquent letter, “After Pat’s Birthday”. Kevin had hoped a Democratic Congress would bring accountability back to our country. But, just as with warrantless wiretapping and torture, those responsible for the cover-up of his brother’s friendly-fire death have never been held accountable for their actions.
To learn more about the Tillman story, I'd suggest Mary Tillman's "Boots on the Ground by Dusk" (revised paperback at blurb.com), Jon Krakauer's paperback edition of "Where Men Win Glory", or the feralfirefighter blog. And of course, see the film on DVD (2/1 release). Hopefully, Amir Bar-Lev has added footage to the film’s DVD extras that will tell some of this “untold story”.
The Big Eat 2012: 100 Things to Try Before You Die
The Big Eat 2011: 100 Things to Try Before You Die
The Big Veg 2011: 50 Vegetarian (Or Vegan) Things to Eat Before You Die
Four Ways To Escape the Cold in Mexico
Jams We Love: Our Weekly Playlists
10 Best Dishes $10 in the Inner Sunset
Rise and Dine: A Guide to Brunch at SF's Best Restaurants
The Best Cheese in SF (Recommendations from Local Cheese Shops)
Refreshingly Unhip: The Best Vanilla Ice Cream in SF
The 20 Best Dishes Under $10 in the Tenderloin & Tendernob
Community Gardens Around the City
Horseback Riding Within 1.5 Hours of SF
Four Awesome Northern California Hot Springs
Refreshingly Unhip: SF's Old-School Pastrami Sandwiches
The 7 Best Carne Asada Burritos in San Francisco
The 10 Best Dishes Under $10 in the Outer Sunset
The 20 Best Dishes Under $10 in the Mission
The 10 Best Dishes Under $10 in Bernal Heights
The 10 Best Dishes Under $10 in the Lower Haight
The 10 Best Lunches in Union Square Under $10
Refreshingly Unhip: The Best Glazed Dougnuts in SF
Expert Advice on Parking in The City






