The New York Times ran cover story today about Sarah Palin's wardrobe makeover - apparently a $150,000 pop at Neiman Marcus and Saks Fifth Avenue to jazz up her now famous hockey mom meets Tina Fey look.  Following in the vein of jokes about John Edward's $400 haircut, she's taking some heat.   But should she be criticized for it? Candidates walk a fine line - they have to look presentable and stylish, yet at the same time appeal to their base.  But at $150,000,  Glamour's editor Cindi Leive says, "Honey, I could have dressed you for a lot less than that."  What do you think of her new wardrobe?